At one point, he lets the cat out of the bag:
“At the same time the capacity to assert social and political control over the individual
will vastly increase. It will soon be possible to assert almost continuous control over
every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files, containing even the most personal details
about health and personal behavior of every citizen in addition to the more customary
data.
“These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will
gravitate into the hands of those who control information. Our existing institutions will be
supplanted by pre-crisis management institutions, the task of which will be to identify in
advance likely social crises and to develop programs to cope with them. (This describes
the structure of FEMA which came much later.)
“This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a
TECHNOTRONIC ERA, A DICTATORSHIP, leaving even less room for political
procedures as we know them. Finally, looking ahead to the end of the century, the
possibility of BIOCHEMICAL MIND CONTROL AND GENETIC TINKERING WITH
MAN, INCLUDING BEINGS WHICH WILL FUNCTION LIKE MEN AND REASON
LIKE THEM AS WELL, COULD GIVE RISE TO SOME DIFFICULT QUESTIONS.”
Brzezinski was not writing as a private citizen but as Carter’s National Security Advisor
and a leading member of the Club of Rome and a member of the Committee of 300, a
member of the CFR and as a member of the old Polish Black Nobility. His book explains
how America must leave its industrial base behind and enter into what he called “a
distinct new historical era.”
“What makes America unique is its willingness to experience the future, be it pop-art or
LSD. Today, America is the creative society, the others, consciously or unconsciously,
are emulative. What he should have said was that America is the proving ground for
Committee of 300 policies which lead directly to a dissolution of the old order and an
entry into the One World Government-New World Order.
One of the chapters in “The Technotronic Era” explains how new technology will bring
in its wake intense confrontation that will strain social and international peace. Oddly
enough we are already under intense strains through surveillance. Lourdes in Cuba is one
place where this is happening. The other is NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium,
where a giant computer designated “666” can store data of every type mentioned by
Brzezinski, plus possessing an expanded capacity to take in data for several billions more
people than presently exist, if it ever comes to that, but which, in the light of the Global
2000 genocidal report, will probably never need to be utilized.
Retrieval of data will be simple in the United States where Brzezinski and his Committee
of 300 colleagues could simply add social security and or driver licence numbers to 666
to provide the surveillance recording announced. The Committee already in 1981 warned
governments, including the government of the USSR, that there “will be chaos unless the
Committee of 300 takes complete control of preparations for the New World Order.
CONTROL WILL BE EXERCISED THROUGH OUR COMMITTEE AND THROUGH
GLOBAL PLANNIG AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT.” I reported this factual
information a few months after I received it in 1981. Another item I reported back then
was that RUSSIA HAD BEEN INVITED TO JOIN THE PREPARATIONS FOR THE
COMlNG ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.
When I wrote these things in 1981, the conspirators’ global plans were already in an
advanced state of preparedness. Looking back over the past 10 years, it can be seen just
how rapidly the Committee’s plans have advanced. If the information provided in 1981
was alarming, then it should be even more alarming today as we near the final stages of
the demise of the United States as we know it. With unlimited funding, with several
hundred think tanks and 5000 social engineers, the media banking and control of most
governments a reality, we can see that we are tracing a problem of immense proportions,
one that cannot he opposed by any nation at this time.
As I have so often stated, we have been misled into believing that the problem I am
talking about has its origin in Moscow We have been brainwashed into believing that
Communism is the greatest danger we Americans are facing. This is simply not so. The
greatest danger arises from the mass of traitors in our midst. Our Constitution warns us to
be watchful of the enemy within our gates. These enemies are the servants of the
Committee of 300 who occupy high positions within our governmental structure. The
UNITED STATES is where we MUST begin our fight to turn back the tide threatening to
engulf us, and where we must meet, and defeat these internal conspirators.
The Club of Rome also had a direct hand in creating the 25-year old war in EI Salvador,
as an integral part of the wider plan drawn up by Elliot Abrams of the U.S. State
Department. It was Committee of 300 member Willy Brandt, leader of the Socialist
International and a former chancellor of West Germany, who paid for the “final
offensive” by the Salvadorian guerrillas which, fortunately, was not successful. EI
Salvador was chosen by the committee to turn Central America into a zone for a new
Thirty-Year War, which task was allocated to Kissinger to carry out under the innocuous
title of “The Andes Plan.”
Just to demonstrate how the conspirators operate across all national boundaries, the “final
offensive” action planned by Willy Brandt came about as a result of a visit to Felipe
Gonzalez, who at the time was preparing himself for his Club of Rome-ordained role as
Spain’s future prime minister. Apart from myself and one or two of my intelligence
colleagues and former colleagues, no one appeared to have heard of Gonzalez before he
surfaced in Cuba. Gonzalez was the Club of Rome’s case officer for EI Salvador, and the
first Socialist to be elevated to political power in Spain since the death of General Franco.
Gonzalez was on his way to Washington to attend the Club of Rome Socialist “get
Reagan” meeting which took place in December 1980. Present at the Gonzalez-Castro
meeting was the left-wing guerrilla, Guillermo Ungo, run by the Institute for Policy
Studies (IPS), the Committee of 300’s most notorious Washington-based leftwing think
tank. Ungo was run by an IPS fellow who died in a mysterious plane crash while enroute
from Washington to Havana to visit Castro.
As most of us know, both the left and the right of the political spectrum is controlled by
the same people, which will help to explain the fact that Ungo was a life-long friend of
the late Napoleon Duarte, leader of the rightwing in EI Salvador. It was after the Cuban
meeting that the “final offensive” by the Salvadorian guerrillas was carried out.
The polarizing of South America and the U.S was a special assignment given to
Kissinger by the Committee of 300. The Malvinas War (also known as the Falklands
War) and the subsequent overthrow of the Argentine government, followed by economic
chaos and political upheavals, were planned by Kissinger Associates acting in concert
with Lord Carrington, a top-ranking member of the Committee of 300.
One of the principal Committee of 300 assets in the U.S., the Aspen Institute of
Colorado, also helped plan events in Argentina even as it did in the case of the fall of the
Shah of Iran. Latin America is important to the United States, not only because we have
so many mutual defense treaties with countries there, but also because it has the potential
of providing a huge market for American exports of technology, heavy industrial
equipment which world have galvanized many of our faltering companies and provided
thousands of new jobs. This was to be prevented all costs, even if it meant 30 years of
war.
Instead of seeing this huge potential in a positive light, the Committee of 300 saw it as a
dangerous threat to its post-industrial zero-growth U.S. plans and immediately acted to
make an example of Argentina as a warning to other Latin American nations to forget
any ideas they may have had to promote nationalism, independence and sovereign
integrity. This is the reason why so many Latin American countries turned to drugs as
their sole means of support, which may very well have been the intention of the
conspirators in the first place.
Americans in general look down on Mexico, which is precisely the attitude with which
the Committee wants the people of the United States to regard Mexico. What we need to
do is change our thinking about Mexico and South America in general. Mexico represents
a potentially huge market for all types of U.S. goods which could mean thousands of jobs
for Americans and Mexicans alike. Transferring our industries “south of the border” and
paying the maquiladores slave wages is not in the interests of either country. It benefits
nobody but the “Olympians.”
Mexico received most of its nuclear power technology from Argentina, but the Malvinas
War put an end to that. The Club of Rome decreed back in 1986 that it would stop
exports of nuclear technology to developing countries. With nuclear power stations
generating abundant cheap electricity, Mexico would have become the “Germany of
Latin America.” Such a state of affairs would have been a disaster for the conspirators
who have, by 1991, stopped all exports of nuclear technology except that destined for
Israel.
What the Committee of 300 has in mind for Mexico is a feudal peasantry, a condition that
allows for easy management and looting of Mexican oil. A stable and prosperous Mexico
can only be a plus for the United States. This is what the conspirators wish to prevent, so
they have engaged in decades of innuendo, slander and direct economic war on Mexico.
Before former President Lopes Portillo took office and nationalized the banks Mexico
was losing $200 million a day to capital flight, organized and orchestrated by the
Committee of 300’s representatives in banks and brokerage houses on Wall Street.
If only we in the United States had statesmen and not politicians running the country, we
could act together and set back the One World Government-New World Order plans to
return Mexico to a state of helplessness. If we were able to defeat the Club of Rome’s
plans for Mexico, it would come as a shock to the Committee of 300, a shock from which
they would take a long time to recover. The inheritors of the Illuminati pose as great a
threat to the United States as they do to Mexico. By seeking common ground with
Mexican patriotic movements we in the United States could forge a formidable force to
be reckoned with. But such action requires leadership, and we are more lacking in
leadership than in any other area of endeavor.
The Committee of 300 through its many affiliated organizations was able to nullify the
Reagan presidency. Here is what Stuart Butler of the Heritage Foundation had to say on
the subject “The right thought it had won in 1980 but in fact it have lost.” What Butler
was referring to was the situation in which the Right found itself when it realized that
every single position of importance in the Reagan administration was filled by Fabianist
appointees recommended by the Heritage Foundation. Butler went on to say that Heritage
would use rightwing ideas to impose leftwing radical principles upon the United States,
the same radical ideas which Sir Peter Vickers Hall, top Fabianist in the U.S. and the
number one man at Heritage, had been openly discussing during the election year.
Sir Peter Vickers Hall remained an active Fabianist even though he was running a
conservative “think tank.” As a member of the British oligarchical Vickers armament
manufacturing family, he had position and power. The Vickers family supplied both sides
in the First World War and again during Hitler’s rise to power. Vickers’ official cover was
the University of California’s Urban and Regional Development Institute. He was a
longtime confidant of British Labour leader and Committee of 300 member Anthony
Wedgewood Benn.
Both Vickers and Benn are integrated with the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations,
the premiere brainwashing institution in the world. Vickers uses his Tavistock training to
very good effect when speech-making. Consider the following example:
“There are two Americas. One is the nineteenth century heavy-industry based society.
The other is the growing post industrial society, in some cases built on the shards of the
old America. It is the crisis between these two worlds which will produce the economic
and social catastrophe of the next decade. The two worlds are in fundamental opposition,
they cannot co- exist. In the end the post industrial world must crush and obliterate the
other one.” Remember, this speech was made in 1981 and we can see from the state of
our economy and our industries just how accurate was Sir Peter’s prediction. When
concerned people ask me how long the 1991 recession will last, I refer them to Sir Peter’s
statements and add my own opinion that it will not end until 1995/1996, and even then
what emerges will not be the America we knew in the 1960’s and 1970’s. That America
has already been destroyed.
I reported Sir Peter’s speech in my newsletter soon after it was delivered. How prophetic
it was, but then it was easy to predict a future already written for America by the
Committee of 300 and its executive Club of Rome. What was Sir Peter saying in a
euphemistic manner? Translated into ordinary everyday English, he was saying that the
old American way of life, our true and trusted republican form of government based upon
our Constitution, was going to be crushed by the New World Order. America as we knew
it was going to have to go, or be crushed to pieces.
As I said, Committee of 300 members often make them-selves highly visible. Sir Peter
was no exception. To make it clearly understood where he was coming from, Sir Peter
rounded off his speech by declaring:
“I am perfectly happy working with the Heritage Foundation and groups like that. True
Fabians look to the New Right to push through some of their more radical ideas. For
more than a decade the British population has been subject to a constant propaganda
barrage of how it was on the industrial skids. All of this is true, but the net effect of the
propaganda was to demoralize the population. (Exactly as intended by the new-science
scientist at Tavistock.)
“This will happen in the United States as the economy worsens. This (demoralizing
process) is necessary to make people accept difficult choices. If there is no planning for
the future or if constituencies block progress there will be social chaos on a scale which is
currently hard to imagine. The outlook for urban America is bleak. There is a possibility
of doing something with the inner cities, but basically the cities will shrink and the
manufacturing base will decline. This will produce social convulsions.”
Was Sir Peter a psychic, a magician of great report or merely a charlatan fortune teller
with a great deal of luck? The answer is “none of these.” All Sir Peter was doing was
reading off the blueprint of the Committee of 300-Club of Rome for slow death of the
United States as a former industrial giant. Looking back over the ten years of Sir Peter’s
predictions, can anybody doubt that the Committee of 300’s plans for the demise of an
industrialized United States has become a fait accompli?
Haven’t Sir Peter’s predictions proved to be remarkably accurate? Indeed they have,
almost down to the last word. It is worth noting that Sir Peter Vickers (Sir Peter Vickers-
Hall’s father-in-law) worked on the Stanford Research paper, “Chang-ing Images of
Man,” from which much of the 3000 pages of material advice sent to the Reagan
Administration was taken. Moreover, as a senior MJ6 British intelligence officer, Sir
Peter Vickers was in a position to give Heritage a great deal of advance information.
As a member of the Committee of 300 and NATO, Sir Peter Vickers was around when
NATO directed the Club of Rome to develop a social program which would utterly
change the direction in which America wanted to go. The Club of Rome, under Tavistock
direction, ordered Stanford Research Institute (SRI) to develop such a program, not only
for America, but for every nation in the Atlantic Alliance and the OECD nations.
It was Sir Peter’s protege, Stuart Butler, who gave President Reagan 3000 pages of
“recommendations,” which no doubt contained some opinions expressed by Anthony
Wedgewood Benn, a member of parliament and a ranking member of the Committee of
300. Benn told members of the Socialist Internaional who met in Washington on
December 8, 1980: “You can thrive under Volcker’s credit collapse if you profile Reagan
to intensify the credit collapse.”
That Butler’s advice was taken and applied to the Reagan administration can be seen in
the collapse of the Savings and loan and banking industries which accelerated under
Reagan economic policies. While Benn called it “profiling,” he really meant that Reagan
should be brainwashed. It is worth noting that Von Hayek-who is a founder member of
Heritage-used his student, Milton Friedman, to preside over the Club of Rome’s plans to
deindustrialise America using the Reagan presidency to accelerate the collapse of first the
steel industry, and then the auto and housing industries, for example.
In this regard a French Black Nobility member, Etienne D’Avignon, as a member of the
Committee of 300, was assigned the task of collapsing the steel industry in this country.
It is doubtful that any of the hundreds of thousands of steel workers and shipyard workers
who have been without jobs for the past decade have ever heard of D’Avignon. I fully
reported the D’Avignon Plan in April 1981 Economic Review. Attending that fateful
December 10th Club of Rome meeting in Washington D.C. was a mystery man from Iran
who turned out to be Bani Sadr, the Ayatollah Khomeini’s special envoy.
One speech in particular at the December 10th, 1980 conclave caught my attention,
mainly because it came from Francois Mitterand, a man the French establishment had
discarded and thought to be washed up. But my intelligence source had previously told
me that Mitterand was in the process of being picked up, dusted off and returned to
power, so what he said carried a good deal of weight for me:
“Industrial capitalist development is the opposite of freedom We must put an end to it.
The economic systems of the 20th and 21st century will use machines to crush man, first
in the domain of nuclear energy which is already producing formidable results.
Mitterand’s return to the Elysee Palace was a great triumph for socialism. It proved that
the Committee of 300 was powerful enough to predict happenings and then make them
happen, by force, or by whatever means it took to make its point that it could crush any
and all opposition even if, as in the case of Mitterand, he had been totally rejected a few
short days before by a discerning political power group in Paris.
Another group representative at the December 1980 Washington meetings with “observer
status” was John Graham, also known as “Irwin Suall,” head of the fact-finding
committee of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The ADL is an outright British
intelligence operation run by all three branches of British intelligence, that is, M16 and
the JIO. Suall’s extensive bag of dirty tricks was garnered from the sewers of the East
End of London. Suall is still a member of the super-secret SIS, an elite James Bond type
of operation. Let nobody underestimate the power of the ADL, nor its long reach.
Suall works closely with Hall and other Fabianists. He was singled out as useful to
British intelligence while at Ruskir Labour College at Oxford University in England, the
same communist education center that gave us Milner, Rhodes, Burgess, McLean and
Kim Philby. Oxford and Cambridge Universities have long been the province of the sons
and daughters of the elite, those whose parents belong to the “upper crust” of British high
society. While at Oxford, Suall joined the Young People’s Socialist League, and was
recruited by British intelligence shortly thereafter.
Suall was posted to the United States where he came under the protection and
sponsorship of one of the most insidious leftists in the country, Walter Lippmann.
Lippmann founded and ran the League for Industrial Democracy, and Students for
Democratic Society, both leftist spoiler operations to set indutrial workers at variance
with what it called “the Capitalist class” and management. Both of Lippmann’s projects
were an integral part of the Committee of 300 apparatus that stretched right across
America, of which Lippmann was a most important member.
Suall has strong connections with the Justice Department and can secure FBI profiles of
any person he targets. The Justice Department has orders to give Suall everything he
wants when he wants it. Most of Suall’s activities center around “keeping an eye on
rightwing groups and individuals.” The ADL has an open door to the State Department
and makes good use of State’s impressive intelligence agency.
The State Department has a layer of agents in the right wing, posing as “fearless anti-
Semitic fighters.” There are four leaders in this group of informers, three of whom are
discreet Jewish homosexuals. This spy group has been in operation for the past two
decades. They publish virulently anti-Jewish “newspapers” and sell a wide variety of
anti-Semitic books. One of the principal operators works out of Louisiana. A member of
this group is a writer who is dearly beloved in Christian rightwing circles. The group and
the individuals who go to make it up are under the protection of the ADL. Suall was
deeply involved in ABSCAM and is often called upon by law enforcement agencies to
assist them in investigations and sting operations.
Suall was assigned to “dog Reagan,” in terms of the course laid out for the newly-elected
President by the Heritage Foundation, and to figuratively fire a few warning shots if
Reagan looked like deviating or taking off his blinders at any time. Suall helped to get rid
of any troublesome rightwing advisor not beholden to Heritage for his or her job with the
Reagan administration. Such a person was Ray Donovan, Reagan’s Secretary of Labor,
who was eventually removed from his post thanks to the Dirty Tricks department of the
ADL. James Baker III, one of those on the list of 3000 recommendations made by the
Heritage Foundation, was the go-between who carried Suall’s messages of hate about
Donovan to the President.
Another important conspirator was Philip Agee, the so-called CIA “defector.” Although
not a member of the Committee, he was nevertheless its case officer for Mexico, and run
by the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) and the Council on Foreign
Relations. For the record, nothing that happens in the U.S. happens without the sanction
of the RIIA. It is a continuing and ongoing agreement first OPENLY entered into (there
were many such secret agreements before that) by Churchill and Roosevelt in 1938,
under the terms of which U.S. intelligence services are obliged to share intelligence
secrets with British intelligence.
This is the basis of the so-called “special relationship” between the two countries about
which Churchill and Lord Halifax boasted and which “special relationship” was
responsible for the U.S. fighting the Gulf War against Iraq for and on behalf of British
interests, more especially British Petroleum, one of the most important companies in the
Committee of 300 in which Queen Elizabeth’s immediate family has a big stake.
No intelligence activity has taken place since 1938 except through this special joint
command structure. Philip Agee joined the CIA after graduating from Notre Dame where
he was inducted into its Jesuit Freemason ring. Agee first came to my attention in 1968 as
the intelligence officer behind the riots at the University of Mexico. One of the most
important things about the Mexican student riots was that they occurred at the same time
as student rioting in New York, Bonn, Prague and West Berlin.
With the coordination expertise and its special intelligence network of which INTERPOL
is an integral part, it is not as difficult as it might seem at first sight for the Committee to
set in motion carefully timed global actions, whether they be student rioting or deposing
leaders of supposedly sovereign nations. It is all in a day’s work for the “Olympians.”
From Mexico, Agee moved on to align himself with Puerto Rican terrorist groups.
During this time he became a trusted confidant of the Cuban dictator, Fidel Castro.
It should not be imagined that while Agee was carrying out these operations, he was
doing so as a “rogue” agent. On the contrary, he was working for the CIA all during these
assignments. Trouble came when Castro’s DGI (Cuban intelligence service) was able to
“turn” him. Agee continued to work in his capacity as a member of the CIA until his
double role was uncovered. This involved the biggest Soviet listening post in the West
located at Lourdes, Cuba. Staffed by 3000 Soviet specialists in signals monitoring and
deciphering, Lourdes has the capability of monitoring thousands of electronic signals
his mistress was picked up at Lourdes and used to telling effect.
Although we are told today in 1991 that “Communism is dead,” the United States has
done nothing to close down the vast spy operation which sits on our doorstep.
Incidentally Lourdes has the capability of picking up even the weakest “tempest” signal,
which is the type given off by a fax machine or an electric typewriter which, when
deciphered, will give the contents of whatever is being typed or faxed. Lourdes remains
dagger in the heart of the United States. There is absolutely no reason for its continued
existence. If the U.S. and USSR are truly at peace with each other, why the continued
need for so massive a spy operation? The simple truth is that, rather than retrenching
personnel as we are led to believe, the KGB has taken on additional recruits during 1990
and 1991.
Bernard Levin is probably not a name that is well-known in the United States. Unlike
decadent “pop stars” or Hollywood’s latest miserable “discovery, ,” academics seldom if
ever come before the public eye. Of the hundreds of academics in the United States
working under the Control of the Club of Rome, Levin is worthy of special mention, if
for no reason other than his role in undermining Iran, the Philippines, South Africa,
Nicaragua and South Korea. The demise of the Shah of Iran was run to a plan devised by
Bernard Levin and Richard Falk, and supervised by Robert Anderson’s Aspen Institute.
Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club
of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual
leaders. Here is an extract of the document:
“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in
exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may
expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and
promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the
structure of the situ-tion unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a
particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even
those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the
severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”
This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals,
particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that
“Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me
assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other
country.
The Levin-Club of Rome plan is designed to demoralize us all so that in the end we feel
we should follow whatever it is that is planned for us. We WILL follow Club of Rome
orders like sheep. Any seemingly strong leader who SUDDENLY APPEARS to “rescue”
the nation must be regarded with the utmost suspicion. Remember that Khomeini was
groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he
sud-denly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable.
The Club of Rome feels confident that it has carried out it Committee of 300 mandate to
“soften up” the United States. After 45 years of waging war on the people of this nation,
who will doubt that it has indeed accomplished its task? Look around and see how we
have been demoralized. Drugs, pornography rock and roll “music,” free sex, the family
unit all but totally undermined, lesbianism, homosexuality and finally the ghastly murder
of millions of innocent babies by their own mothers. Has there ever been a crime so vile
as mass abortion?
With the U.S. spiritually, morally bankrupted, with our industrial base destroyed
throwing 30 million people out of work with our big cities ghastly cesspools of every
imaginable crime with a murder rate almost three times higher than any other country,
with 4 million homeless, with corruption in government reaching endemic proportions,
who will gainsay that the United States is ready to collapse from within, into the waiting
arms of the New Dark Age One World Government?
The Club of Rome has succeeded in splitting the Christian churches; it has succeeded in
building up an army of charismatics fundamentalists and evangelicals who will fight for
the Zionist State of Israel. During the Gulf War of genocide I received scores of letters
asking me how I could oppose “a just Christian war against Iraq.” How could I doubt that
Christian fundamentalist support for the (Committee of 300’s) war against Iraq was not
Biblical– after all didn’t Billy Graham pray with President Bush just before the shooting
started? Doesn’t the Bible speak of “wars and rumors of wars”?
These letters give an insight into just how well the Tavistock Institute has done its work.
The Christian fundamentalists will be a formidable force behind the state of Israel,
exactly as planned. How sad that these fine people do not realize that they have been
GROSSLY MISUSED by the Club of Rome and that their opinions and beliefs are NOT
THEIR OWN, but those created for them by the hundreds of Committee of 300 “think
tanks” that dot the American landscape. In other words, like any other segment of the
United States population, the Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals have been
thoroughly brainwashed.
We as a nation are ready to accept the demise of the United States of America and the
American way of life, once the envy of the entire world. Do not think this has happened
on its own– the old “times are changing” syndrome. Time does not change anything,
PEOPLE do. It is a mistake to think of the Committee of 300 and the Club of Rome as
European institutions. The Club of Rome exercises great influence and power in the
United States, and has its own chapter based in Washington D.C.
Senator Claiborne Pell is its leader, and one of its members is Frank M. Potter, a one-time
staff director of the House Sub-committee on Energy. It is not difficult to see how the
Club of Rome has maintained its grip on U.S. energy policies and where
“environmentalist” opposition to nuclear energy is coming from. Perhaps the Club’s
greatest success story is its hold over Congress in regard to nuclear energy which has had
the effect of preventing the U. S. from entering the 21st century as a strong industrial
nation. The effect of the anti-nuclear policy of the Club of Rome can be measured in
terms of silent blast furnaces. derelict railroad yards, rusting steel mills, shipyards long
since closed down and a valuable trained work force scattered across the United States,
which may never again be assembled.
Other Club of Rome members in the U.S. are Walter A. Hahn of the Congressional
Research Service, Ann Cheatham and Douglas Ross, both senior economists. Ross’s task,
in his own words, was to “translate Club of Rome perspectives into legislation to help the
country get away from the illusion of plenty. ” Ann Cheatham was the director of an
organization called “Congressional Clearing House For The Future.”
Her task was to profile members of Congress who would be susceptible to astrology and
New Age mumbo-jumbo. At one stage she had in excess of 100 Congressmen in her
classes. Daily sessions were held in which a variety of astrological “forecasts” were made
based on her “occult perceptions.” Besides Congressmen, other prominent people who
attended her sessions were Michael Walsh, Thornton Bradshaw–A LEADING
MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300–and David Sternlight, a senior vicepresident
of Allstate Insurance Company.
Some of the more important members of the Committee of 300 are also members of
NATO, a fact which we ought to remember. These Committee of 300 members often
hold several offices. Among the NATO-Club of Rome membership are found Harland
Cleveland, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO, Joseph Slater, a director of the Aspen
Institute, Donald Lesh, a former staffer in the U.S. National Security Agency, George
McGhee and Claiborne Pell, to name a few examples.
It is important that we remember these names, make a list of them if you wish, so as to
recall who they are and what they stand for when their names come up in television
programs and news services. Following intelligence modus vivendi, leaders of the
Committee often appear on television, usually in the most innocent of guises. We ought
to be aware that nothing they do is innocent.
The Committee of 300 has planted its agents in the muscle and sinew of the United
States, in its government, in Congress, in advisory posts around the President, as
ambassadors and as Secretaries of State. From time to time the Club of Rome holds
gatherings and conferences which, although they appear under innocuous titles, break up
into action committees, each of which is assigned a specific task and a specific target date
by which time their assignments must be completed. If it does nothing else, the
Committee of 300 is working to a very specific time- table.
The first Club of Rome conference in the United States was called by the Committee of
300 in 1969 under the title: “The Association of the Club of Rome. ” The next meeting
was held in 1970 under the title “Riverdale Center of Religious Research” and was
directed by Thomas Burney. Then followed the Wood-lands Conference held in Houston,
Texas, starting in 1971 Thereafter, regular conferences have been held at Woodlands
every year. Also in 1971, at a later date, the Mitchell Energy and Development
Corporation held its energy strategy meeting for the Club of Rome: The recurring theme:
LIMIT THE GROWTH OF THE U.S.A. Then to crown it all, the First Global
Conference on the Future was held in July of 1980, attended by 4000 social engineers and
members of think tanks, all of whom were members of or affiliated with various
institutions operating under Club of Rome umbrella organizations.
The First Global Conference on the Future had the blessing of the White House which
held its own conference based on the transcripts of the First Global Conference forum. It
was called the “White House Commission on the 1980’s” and OFFICIALLY
recommended the policies of the Club of Rome “as a guide to future U.S. policies” and
even went so far as to say that the United States economy is moving out of the industrial
phase This echoed the theme of Sir Peter Vickers Hall and Zbibniew Brzezinsky and
provides further proof of the control exercised by the Committee of 300 over U.S. affairs,
both domestic and foreign.
As I said in 1981, we are set up, politically, socially and economically so that we remain
locked into the Club of Rome’s plans. Everything is RIGGED against us. If we are to
survive then we must break the stranglehold the Committee of 300 has on our
government. In every election since Calvin Coolidge ran for the White House, the
Committee of 300 has been able to plant its agents in key positions in government so that
it matters not who gets the White House post. For example, every one of the candidates
who ran for the Presidency, from the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt, were selected, some
like to call it “hand picked,” by the Council on Foreign Relations acting on the
instructions of the RIIA.
Especially in the 1980 election, every candidate for the highest office in the United States
was run by the CFR. Therefore it was of no consequence to the conspirators who won the
presidential race. Through such Trojan Horses as the Heritage Foundation and the CFR,
ALL key policy making positions in the new administrations were filled by the Council
on Foreign Relations nominees, and before that, since the 1960’s, by NATO-Club of
Rome yes-men, thereby ensuring that key policy decisions bore the indelible stamp of the
Club of Rome and the CFR, acting as the executive arms of the Committee of 300.
Both the 1984 and 1988 elections followed this long-established pattern. Secretary of
State George Schultz was the perfect choice of the Committee of 300 for the office of
Secretary of State. Schultz was always a creature of Henry Kissinger, the ruling ordergiver
for the CFR. Moreover, his position with Bechtel, a key Committee of 300
company of global dimensions, gave him access to countries that might otherwise have
been suspicious of his Kissinger connection. The Carter Administration accelerated the
process of key pro-conspiracy personnel in key positions. Before Carter was elected, his
key campaign strategist, Hamilton Jordan, said that if Cyrus Vance or Brzezinski
received appointments in the Carter cabinet, he, Jordan, would resign. They did. Jordan
did not resign.
Carter’s choice of Paul Volcker (in fact he was told to appoint Volcker by David
Rockefeller) started the collapse of the U.S. economy according to the plan laid down by
the Club of Rome. We are up against powerful forces who are dedicated to the goal of a
One World Government. We have been engaged in a devastatingly crippling war for the
past 45 years, only it is not perceived as such. We are brainwashed, methodically and
systematically, without ever being aware of it. The Tavistock Institute provided the
system for this to take place, and then set its operations in motion.
The only way we can fight back is by exposing the conspirators and their multiplicity of
front organizations. We need men with experience who can formulate strategy to defend
our priceless heritage which, once lost, will never again reappear. We need to learn the
methods the conspirators use; learn them and adopt counter-measures. Only a crash
program will stop the rot which is consuming our nation.
Some may have difficulty in accepting the idea of a global conspiracy because so many
writers have made financial gain from it. Others doubt that activity on a global scale can
be successfully advanced. They see the huge bureaucracy of our government and then
say, “Well, how are we supposed to believe that private people can do more than the
government does? This overlooks the fact that government is part of the conspiracy. Hard
evidence is what they want and hard evidence is difficult to come by.
Others say, “So what. What do I care about a conspiracy, I don’t even bother to vote.”
That is exactly the way the general population of America was profiled to react. Our
people have become discouraged and confused, the results of 45 years of warfare
conducted against us. How this is done is explained in Bernard Lewin’s book, but how
many people would bother to read an academic’s non-fiction book? We are reacting
exactly as we were profiled to act. Demoralized and confused people will be far more
ready to welcome the sudden appearance of a great man who promises to solve every
problem and guarantee a well-ordered society in which people are fully employed and
domestic strife is minimal. Their dictator, for that is who it will be, will be welcomed
with open arms.
Knowing WHO the enemy is a vital necessity. No one can fight and against an
unidentified enemy. This book could be used as a military field manual. Study its content
and memorize all names. I have mentioned profiling techniques quite frequently in this
chapter. A full explanation of “profiling” is contained in the next chapter. One of the
most profound pieces of information to come out of the science of profiling is the relative
ease in which this can be accomplished in individuals, party groups, political entities and
so on right on down the line. Once we wake up as to how easy this is to do, the
conspiracy will no longer be more than we can comprehend. The assassination of
President Kennedy and the attempt on the life of President Reagan become easy to
understand.
INSTITUTlONS THROUGH WHICH CONTROL IS EXERCISED
Profiling is a technique developed in 1922 on command of the Royal Institute for
International Affairs (RIIA). Major John Rawlings Reese, a British Army technician, was
instructed to set up the largest brainwashing facility in the world at the Tavistock Institute
for Human Relations as a part of Sussex University. This became the core of Britain’s
Psychological Warfare Bureau. When I first introduced the names of Reese and
Tavistock into the United States in 1970, very little interest was shown. But over the
years, as I revealed more and more about Tavistock and its vital role in the conspiracy, it
has become popular to imitate my earlier research.
Britain’s Psychological Warfare Bureau made extensive use of the work done by Reese
on his 80,000 British Army guinea pigs, captive soldiers who underwent many forms of
testing. It was Tavistock-designed methods that got the United States into the Second
World War and which, under the guidance of Dr. Kurt Lewin, established the OSS, the
forerunner of the CIA. Lewin became the director of the Strategic Bombing Survey,
which was a plan for the Royal Air Force to concentrate on bombing German worker
housing while leaving military targets, such as munition plants, alone. The munition
plants on both sides belonged to the international bankers who had no wish to see their
assets destroyed. Later, after the war was over, NATO ordered Sussex University to
establish a very special brainwashing center which became part of Britain’s Psychological
Warfare Bureau, only now, its research was directed toward civilian rather than military
ap-plications. We shall return to that super secret unit which was called Science Policy
Research Institute (SPRI) under our chapters on drugs. The idea behind saturation
bombing of civilian worker housing was to break the morale of the German worker. It
was not designed to affect the war effort against the German military machine. Lewin and
his team of actuaries reached a target figure, that if 65% of German worker housing was
destroyed by nightly RAF bombing, the morale of the civilian population would collapse.
The actual document was prepared by the Pru-dential Assurance Company. The RAF,
under the command of “Bomber” Harris, carried out Lewin’s plans, culminating in the
terror firestorm bombing of Dresden, in which over 125,000, mainly old men, women
and children, were killed. The truth of “Bomber” Harris’s horror raids on German
civilians was a well kept secret until long after the end of WW II. Tavistock provided
most of the detailed programs that led to the establishing of the Office of Naval
Intelligence, (ONI) the number one intelligence service in the United States, one which
dwarfs the CIA in size and scope. Contracts worth billions of dollars were given to
Tavistock by the United States Government and Tavistock’s strategic planners provide
most of what the Pentagon uses for our defense establishment, even today. Here again is
illustrated the grip the Committee of 300 has on the United States, and the majority of our
institutions. Tavistock runs over 30 research institutions in the United States, all of which
we will name in our charts at the end of the book. These Tavistock-U.S. institutions have
in many cases grown into gargantuan monsters, penetrating every aspect of our government
agencies and taking command of all policy making. One of Tavistock’s chief
wreckers of our way of life was Dr. Alexander King, a founder member of NATO and a
favorite with the Committee of 300, as well as an outstanding member of the Club of
Rome. Dr. King was assigned by the Club of Rome to destroy America’s education by
taking control of the National Teachers Association and working in close conjunction
with certain law makers and judges. If it was not generally known how all-pervading is
the influence of the Committee of 300, this book should dispel every vestige of that
doubt. The trial run for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) a Club of
Rome creation came in a test run against the nuclear power station at Three Mile Island,
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Termed “an accident” by the hysterical media, this was not an
accident but a deliberately designed crisis test for FEMA. An additional benefit was the
fear and hysteria created by the news media which had people fleeing the area when in
fact they were never in any danger. It was considered a success by FEMA and it scored a
lot of points for the anti-nuclear forces. TMI became the rallying point for the so-called
“environmentalists,” a highly financed and controlled group run out of Aspen Institute on
behalf of the Club of Rome. Coverage was provided free of charge by William Paley of
CBS television, a former British intelligence agent. FEMA is a natural successor to the
Strategic Bombing Survey of WW II. Dr. Kurt Lewin, theoretician for what the Tavistock
conspirators called crisis management, was deeply involved in the study. There is an
unbroken chain between Lewin and Tavistock that stretches back for thirty-seven years.
Lewin in- corporated the Strategic Bombing Survey into FEMA, with only a few small
adjustments proving necessary, one of the changes being the target, WHICH WAS NO
LONGER GERMANY BUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Forty-five years
after the end of WW II it is still Tavistock that has its hands on the trigger, and the
weapon is pointed at the United States. The late Margaret Mead conducted an intensive
study of the German and Japanese population, under the aegis of Tavistock, on how they
reacted to stress caused by aerial bombardment. Irving Janus was an associate professor
on the project which was supervised by Dr. John Rawlings Reese, promoted to Brigadier-
General in the British Army. The test results were given to FEMA. The Irving Janus
report was of great value in formulating FEMA policies. Janus used it in a book which he
later wrote entitled AIR WAR AND STRESS. The ideas in his book were followed TO
THE LETTER BY FEMA DURING THE THREE MILE ISLAND “CRISIS.” Janus had
a really simple idea: Simulate a succession of crises and manipulate the popu-lation
following the Lewin terror tactics and they will do exactly as required. In carrying out
this exercise, Lewin discovered something new, that social control on a wide scale can be
achieved by using the news media to bring home the horrors of a nuclear war via the
television media. It was discovered that women’s magazines were very effective in
dramatizing the terrors of a nuclear war. A trial run conducted by Janus had Betty
Bumpers, wife of Sena-tor Dale Bumpers of Arkansas, “writing” for McCalls magazine
on that subject. The article appeared in McCalls January 1983 issue. Actu-ally, Mrs.
Bumpers did not write the article, it was created for her by a group of writers at Tavistock
whose speciality such subject matters are. It was a collection of untruths, non-facts,
innuendoes and conjectures based entirely upon false premises. The Bumpers article was
typical of the kind of psychological manipulation at which Tavistock is so very good. Not
one of the ladies who read McCalls could have failed to be impressed by the terror-horror
story of what a nuclear war looks like. The Committee of 300 has a major bureaucracy at
its dis-posal made up of hundreds of think tanks and front organizations that run the
whole gamut of private business and government leaders. I will mention as many as I can
fit in, starting with the German Marshall Fund. Its members, and remember they are also
members of NATO and the Club of Rome, consist of David Rockefeller of Chase
Manhattan Bank, Gabriel Hague of the prestigious Manufactures Hanover Trust and
Finance Corporation, Milton Katz of the Ford Foundation, Willy Brandt, leader of
Socialist International, KGB agent and member of the Committee of 300, Irving
Bluestone, chairman of the United Auto Workers Executive Board, Russell Train, U.S.
president of the Club of Rome and Prince Philip’s World Wildlife Fund, Elizabeth
Midgely, CBS programs producer, B. R. Gifford, director of the Russell Sage
Foundation, Guido Goldman of the Aspen Institute the late Averill Harriman, Committee
of 300 extraordinary member, Thomas L. Hughes of the Carnegie Endowment Fund,
Dennis Meadows and Jay Forrestor of MIT “world dynamics.” The Committee of 300,
although in existence for over 150 years, did not take on its present form until around
1897. It was always given to issuing orders through other fronts, such as the Royal
Institute for International Affairs. When it was decided that a super-body would control
European affairs, the RIIA founded the Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO.
For Five years NATO was financed by the German Marshall Fund. Perhaps the most
important member of the Bilderbergers, a foreign policy body of the Committee, was
Joseph Rettinger, said to have been its founder and organizer, whose annual meetings
have delighted conspiracy hunters for several decades. Rettinger was a well-trained Jesuit
priest and a 33rd Degree Freemason. Mrs. Katherine Meyer Graham who is suspected of
having murdered her husband in order to get control of the Washington Post, was another
ranking member of the Club of Rome, as was Paul G. Hoffman of the New York Life
Insurance Company, one of the largest insurance companies in the United States and a
leading Rank company, with ties directly to Queen Elizabeth of England’s immediate
family. John J. McCloy, the man who attempted to wipe post-World War II Germany off
the map and last but not least, James A. Perkins of the Carnegie Corporation, were also
founding members of the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome. What a star-studded cast!
Yet strangely enough, few if any outside of genuine intelligence agencies had ever heard
of this organization until recent times. The power exercised by these important
personages and the corporations, television stations newspapers, insurance companies
and banks they represent matches the power and prestige of at least two European
countries, and still this is only the tip of The Committee of 300’s enormous cross-gridding
and interfaced interests. Not mentioned in the foregoing line-up is Richard Gardner who,
although an early member of the Committee of 300, was sent to Rome on a special
assignment. Gardner married into one of the oldest Black Nobility families of Venice,
thus providing the Venetian aristocracy a direct line to the White House. The late Averill
Harriman was another of the committee’s direct links with the Kremlin and the White
House, a position which Kissinger inherited after the death of Harriman. The Club of
Rome is indeed a formidable agency of the Committee of 300. Although ostensibly
working on American affairs, the group overlaps other Committee of 300 agencies and its
United States members are often found working with “problems” in Japan and Germany.
Some of the front organizations operated by the above committee include the following,
although not limited to them:
LEAGUE OF INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY Officials: Michael Novak, Jeane
Kirkpatrick, Eugene Rostow, IRWIN SUALL, Lane Kirkland, Albert Schenker. Purpose:
To disrupt and disturb normal labor relations between workers and employees by brain
washing labor unions to make impossible demands with special attention to steel, automobile
and housing industries.
FREEDOM HOUSE Officials: Leo Churn and Carl Gershman. Purpose: To spread
socialist disinformation among Ameri-can blue collar workers, spread dissension and
dissatisfaction. Now that these objectives have been largely realized, Gershman has been
drafted by Lawrence Eagleburger to CEDC, a newly created body to stop a united
Germany from expanding its trade into the Danube Basin.
COMMITTEE FOR A DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY Officials: Ben Wattenburg, Jean
Kirkpatrick, Elmo Zumwa and Midge Dector. Purpose: To provide a connecting link
between the educated socialist class and minority groups with the intent of setting up a
solid block of voters who can be counted on to vote for leftwing candidates at election
time. It was really a Fabianist operation from start to finish.
FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Officials: Robert Strausz Hupe.
Purpose: To undermine and eventually end NASA space program.
SOCIAL DEMOCRATS U.S.A. Officials: Bayard Rustin, Lane Kirkland, Jay
Lovestone, Carl Gershman, Howard Samuel, Sidney Hook. Purpose: To spread radical
socialism, especially among minority groups, and forge links between similar
organizations in socialist countries. Lovestone was for decades the leading advisor to
U.S. presidents on Soviet affairs and a strong direct link with Moscow.
INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RELATIONS Officials: Harland Cleveland, Willis
Harmon. Purpose: Change the way America thinks.
THE CITIZENS LEAGUE Officials: Barry Commoner. Purpose: To bring “common
cause” legal suits against vari-ous government agencies, especially in the defense
industries.
WAR RESISTERS LEAGUE Officials: Noam Chomsky and David McReynolds.
Purpose: To organize resistance to the Vietnam War among leftwing groups, students and
the Hollywood “in crowd.”
THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST ORGANIZING COMMITTEE OF THE
INSTITUTE FOR DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM Officials: Frank Zeider, Arthur
Redier and David McReynolds. Purpose: A clearing house for leftwing socialist ideas and
activities in the U.S and Europe.
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FACT FINDING DIVISION Officials: IRWIN
SUALL, also known as John Graham. Purpose: A joint FBI-British intelligence operation
designed to single out rightwing groups and their leaders and put them out of business
before they grow too large and too influential.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS Purpose: A labor oriented
front for the Socialist International and a hot-bed of organized labor unrest polarizing
workers and management.
AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS Officials: Murray Findley, IRWIN
SUALL and Jacob Scheinkman. Purpose: Much the same as the Machinists Union, to socialize
and polarize workers in the garment trade.
A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE Officials: Bayard Rustin. Purpose: To provide a
means of coordinating organizations with a common purpose, an example of which
would be the spread of socialist ideas among college students and workers.
CAMBRIDGE POLICY STUDIES INSTITUTE Officials: Gar Apelrovitz. Purpose:
To expand on the work being done at the Institute for Policy Studies. Founded in
February 1969 by international socialist, Gar Apelrovitz, former assistant to Senator
Gaylord Nelson. Apelrovitz wrote the controversial book ATOMIC DI-PLOMACY for
the Club of Rome which work was financed by the German Marshall Fund. It
concentrates on research and action projects, with a stated goal of fundamentally
changing American society, i. .e., to create a Fabianist United States in preparation of the
coming One World Government.
ECONOMIC COMMITTEE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC INSTITUTE Officials:
Dr. Aurellio Peccei. Purpose: NATO think-tank on global economic issues.
CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS Officials:
Founder Robert Hutchins of the Committee of 300, Harry Ashmore, Frank Kelly and a
large group of “Fellows.” Purpose: To spread ideas that will bring on social reforms of
the liberal kind with democracy as an ideology. One of its activities is to draft a new
constitution for the U.S. which will be strongly monarchical and socialistic as found in
Denmark. The Center is an “Olympian” stronghold. Located in Santa Barbara, it is
housed in what is affectionately called “the Parthenon.” Former Representative John
Rarick called it “an outfit loaded with Communists.” By 1973 work on a new United
States Constitution was in its thirty-fifth draft which proposes an amendment
guaranteeing “environmental right,” the thrust of which is to reduce the industrial base of
the U.S. to a mere whisper of what it was in 1969. In other words, this institution is
carrying out Club of Rome zero-growth post-industrial policies laid down by the
Committee of 300. Some of its other aims are control of economic cycles, welfare,
regulation of business and national public works, con- trol of pollution. Speaking on
behalf of the Committee of 300, Ashmore says the function of the CSDI is to find ways
and means of making our political system work more effectively. “We must change
education and we must consider a new U.S Constitution and a Constitution for the
world,” Ashmore says.
Further goals enunciated by Ashmore are as follows:
(1) Membership of the U.N. must be made universal. (2) The U.N. must be strengthened.
(3) South East Asia must be neutralized. (For neutralized, read “Communized.”) (4) Cold
War must be ended. (5) Racial discrimination must be abolished. (6) Developing nations
must be assisted. (Meaning assisted to destruct.) (7) No military solutions to problems.