forces and contrive new ways TO BIND AND GUIDE THE WORLD” (emphasis added-
JC).
Bernays was not bold enough to tell the world who the “THEY” are who “pull the wires
which control the public mind…, ” but in this book we shall make up for his intentional
oversight by disclosing the existence of that “relatively small number of persons,” the
Committee of 300. Bernays was roundly applauded for his work by the CFR whose
members voted to place him in charge of CBS. William Paley became his “undergraduate”
and eventually replaced Bernays, having acquired thorough knowledge of the
new-science science of public opinion making, which made CBS the leader of the field, a
role which CBS television and radio has never relinquished. Political and financial
control by the “relatively small number,” as Bernays called them, is exercised through a
number of secret societies, most notably the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and perhaps
even more importantly, through the Venerable Or-der of the Knights of St. John of
Jerusalem, an ancient order consisting of the British monarch’s hand-picked executives
chosen for their expertise in areas vital to the continued control of the Committee. In my
work “The Order of St. John of Jerusalem” published in 1986, I described The Order in
the following manner:
“…It is therefore not a secret society, except where its purposes have been perverted in
the inner councils like the Order of the Garter, which is a prostituted oligarchi- cal
creation of the British royal family, which makes a mockery of what the Sovereign Order
of St. John of Jerusalem stands for.
“As an example, we find the atheist Lord Peter Carrington, who pretends to be an
Anglican Christian but who is a member of the Order of Osiris and other demonic sects,
including Freemasonry, installed as a Knight of the Garter at St. George’s Chapel,
Windsor Castle, by Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of England, of the Black Nobility
Guelphs, also head of the Anglican Church, which she thoroughly despises.”
Carrington was selected by the Committee of 300 to bring down the government of
Rhodesia, sign over the mineral wealth of Angola and South West Africa to City of
London control, wreck the Argentine and turn NATO into a leftwing political
organization beholden to the Committee of 300.
Another strange face we see attaching itself to the Holy Christian Order of St. John of
Jerusalem, and I use the word stranger as it is used in the original Hebrew of the Old
Testa- ment to denote the lineage of an individual, is that of Major Louis Mortimer
Bloomfield, the man who helped plan the mur-der of John F. Kennedy. We see photos of
this “strange” man wearing with pride the Cross of Malta, the same cross worn on the
sleeve of the Knights of the Order of the Garter.
We have been so brainwashed that we believe the British royal family is just a nice,
harmless and colorful institution, and fail to realize just how corrupt and therefore highly
dangerous is this institution called the British Monarchy. The Knights of the Order of the
Garter are the INNERMOST circle of the most corrupt public servants who have utterly
betrayed the trust placed in them by their nation, their people.
The Knights of the Order of the Garter are the leaders of the Committee of 300, Queen
Elizabeth II’s most trusted “privy council.” When I did my research on the Order of St.
John of Jerusalem some years ago, I went to Oxford to talk with one of the Masters who
is a specialist on ancient and modern British traditions. He told me that the Knights of the
Garter are the inner sanctum, the elite of the elite of Her Majesty’s Most Venerable Order
of St. John of Jerusalem. Let me say this is not the original order founded by the true
Christian warrior, Peter Gerard, but is typical of many fine institutions that are taken over
and destroyed from the inside, while yet appearing to the uninitiated to be the original.
From Oxford I went to the Victoria and Albert Museum and gained access to the papers
of Lord Palmerston, one of the founders of the Opium Dynasty in China. Palmerston, like
so many of his kind, was not only a Freemason, but a dedicated servant of Gnosticism….
Like the present ‘royal family,’ Palmerston made a pretense of being a Christian but was
in fact a servant of Satan. Many satanists became leaders of British aristocracy and made
immense fortunes out of the China opium trade.
I learned from the papers in the museum named after Victoria that she changed the name
of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in 1885 in order to break away from the Catholic
connection of the Order’s founder, Peter Gerard, and renamed it the “Protestant Most
Venerable Order of Jerusalem.” Membership was open to every oligarchical family that
had made its fortune in the China opium trade and every thoroughly decadent family
received place in the ‘new order.’
Many of these venerable gentlemen were responsible for overseeing the prohibition era in
the United States from Canada, where several of its members supplied the whisky ferried
to the United States. Notable among this group was Committee of 300 member Earl Haig,
who gave his whisky franchise to old Joe Kennedy. Both prohibition and the distilleries
who met the demand for alcohol were creations of the British Crown acting through the
Committeemen of 300. It was an experiment which became the forerunner of today’s
drug trade, and the lessons learned from the prohibition era are being applied to the soon
to be legalized drug trade.
Canada is the route most used by Far East heroin suppliers. The British Monarchy sees to
it that this information never becomes public. Using her powers, Queen Elizabeth rules
over Canada through the Governor-General (one wonders how modern Canadians can
accept such an archaic arrangement?), who is the Queen’s PERSONAL representative,
and on down the line to the Privy Council (yet another archaic hang-over from colonialist
days) and the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, who control Canadian commerce in all of
its facets.
Opposition to British rule is suppressed. Canada has some of the most restrictive laws in
the world, including so-called “hate crime” laws imposed upon the country by Jewish
menbers of the House of Lords in England. At present there are four major trials in
various stages in Canada involving persons charged with “hate crimes.” These are the
Finta, Keegstra, Zundel and Ross cases. Anyone who dares to try and show proof of
Jewish control of Canada (which the Bronfmans exercise), is immediately arrested and
charged with so-called “hate crimes.” This will give us some idea of the vastness of the
reach of the Committee of 300 which quite literally sits on top of everything in this
world.
Testifying to the truth of this statement is the fact that the Committee of 300 set up the
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) under the auspices of the Round Table.
This institute is the vehicle for M16-Tavistock black propaganda and wet jobs (an
intelligence cover name denoting an operation where bloodshed is required), nuclear and
terrorist, which goes to the world’s press for dissemination, as well as to government and
military establishments.
Membership of IISS includes representatives of 87 major wire services and press
associations as well as 138 senior editors and columnists drawn from international
newspapers and magazines. Now you know where your favorite columnist gets all of his
information and opinions from. Remember Jack Anderson, Tom Wicker, Sam
Donaldson, John Chancellor, Mary McGrory, Seymour Hersh, Flora Lewis and Anthony
Lewis, et al? The information provided by IISS, especially scenarios like those prepared
to blacken President Hussein and to justify the coming attack on Libya and condemn the
PLO are all specially tailor-made for the occasion. The Mai Lai massacre story published
by Seymour Hersh came straight out of IISS, just in case we wrongly suppose that men
like Hersh do their own research work.
The International Institute for Strategic Studies is nothing more than a higher echelon
opinion-maker as defined by Lippmann and Bernays. Instead of writing books,
newspapers report opinions presented by chosen columnists, and IISS was formed to be a
coordinating center for not only creating opinions, but to get those opinions and scenarios
out much faster and to a greater audience than could be reached by a book, for example.
IISS is a good example of the gridding and interfacing of Committee of 300 institutions.
The idea of bringing IISS into being arose at the 1957 Bilderberger meeting. It will be
recalled that the Bilderberger Conference is a creation of M16 under the direction of the
Royal Institute of International Affairs. The idea came from Alastair Buchan, son of Lord
Tweedsmuir. Buchan was chairman at the time, and a board member of the RIIA and a
member of the Round Table reportedly very close to the British royal family This was the
same conference that welcomed Labour Party leader Dennis Healey to its ranks. Others in
attendance were Francois Duchene, whose mentor, Jean Monet Duchenes, ran the
Trilateral Commission under the tutelage of H. V. Dicks from Tavistock’s Columbus
Center.
Among the governing council of this gigantic propaganda opinion-making apparat is
included the following:
Frank Kitson, a one time controller of The IRA PROVISIONALS, the man who started
the Mau-Mau insurgency in Kenya.
Lazard Freres, represented by Robert Ellsworth.
N. M. Rothschild, represented by John Loudon.
Paul Nitze, representative of Schroeder Bank. Nitze has played a very prominent and
substantial role in matters of Arms Control agreements, which have ALWAYS been
under the direction of the RIIA.
C. L. Sulzberger of the New York Times.
Stansfield Turner, a former director of the CIA.
Peter Calvocoressi, representing Penguin Books.
Royal Institute for International Affairs, represented by Andrew Schoenberg.
Columnists and Reporters, represented by Flora Lewis, Drew Middleton, Anthony
Lewis, Max Frankel. Daniel Ellsberg.
Henry Kissinger.
Robert Bowie, a former director of the ClA’s National Intelligence Estimates.
Flowing from the 1957 Bilderberger meeting, Kissinger was instructed to open a Round
Table office in Manhattan, the nucleus of which consisted of Haig, Ellsberg, Halperin,
Schlessinger, McNamara and the McBundy brothers. Kissinger was directed to fill all
executive positions in the Nixon administration with Round Tablers, loyal to the RIIA
and therefore to the Queen of England. It was no accident that Kissinger chose President
Nixon’s old hangout, the Hotel Pierre, as his center of operations.
The significance of the Round Table-Kissinger operation was thus: On orders of the RIIA
chairman Andrew Schoeberg, a block was placed on all agencies involved in intelligence,
preventing them from giving information to President Nixon. This meant Kissinger and
his staff were getting ALL INTELLIGENCE, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, LAW
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION, INCLUDING FBI DIVISION 5, be-fore any of it
was released to the President. This made certain that all M16-controlled terrorist
operations in the U.S. would have no chance of being leaked. This was Halperin’s
bailiwick.
By working this methodology, Kissinger at once established hegemony over the Nixon
presidency, and after Nixon was disgraced by the Kissinger group and hounded from
office, Kissinger emerged with unprecedented powers such as have not been equaled
before or since Watergate. Some of these seldom enumerated powers included the
following:
Kissinger ordered National Security Decision Memorandum No. I to be drafted by
Halperin, who got the actual wording directly from the RIIA through Round Table
circles. The memorandum appointed Kissinger as the supreme U.S. authority, chairman
of the Verification Panel. All SALT negotiations were directed from here, using Paul
Nitze, Paul Warnke and a nest of traitors inside the Arms Control mission at Geneva.
In addition, Kissinger was appointed to The Vietnam Special Studies Group, which
oversaw and made evaluations of all reports, civilian and military, including intelligence
reports coming out of Vietnam. Kissinger also demanded and got oversight of the “40
Committee,” a super-secret agency that has the task of deciding when and where to
initiate covert activities and then monitors the progress of operations it sets in motion.
Meantime Kissinger ordered a blizzard of wire-taps by the FBI, even on his closest
assistants, so as to give the impression that he was on top of everything. Most of his
circle were told that wiretaps on them were in force. This nearly backfired was an M16
operative by the name of Henry Brandon was ordered wiretapped, but was not informed
by Kissinger. Brandon was doubling as a reporter for the London Times and Kissinger
very nearly got thrown out because nobody does this to the London Times.
The full story of the Ellsberg break-in and the subsequent Watergating of Nixon is too
long to be included here. Suffice to say, Kissinger had control of Ellsberg from the day
that Ellsberg was recruited while at Cambridge. Ellsberg had always been a hardliner in
favor of the Vietnam War, but was gradually “converted” to a radical leftist activist. His
“conversion” was only a shade less miraculous than St. Paul’s Damascus Road
experience.
The entire spectrum of the new left in the United States was the work of British
intelligence M16 acting through Round Table assets and the Institute for Policy Studies
(IPS). Just as it did with all countries with a republican base, whose policies had to be
changed, LPS played a leading role, even as it does today in South Africa and South
Korea. Much of IPS’s activities are explained in my work “IPS Revisited” published in
1990.
IPS had one main function, that being to sow discord and spread disinformation resulting
in chaos. One such program, aimed at America’s youth, centered on drugs. Through a
series of IPS fronts, acts like the stoning of Nixon’s motorcade and a large number of
bombings, a climate of deception was effectively created which led a majority of
Americans to believe that the United States was under threat from the KGB, the GRU and
Cuban DGI. The word went out that a lot of these imaginary agents had close ties to the
Democrats through George McGovern. It was in fact, a model disinformation campaign
for which M16 is justly famous.
Haldeman, Ehrlichman and Nixon’s closest aides had no clue as to what was happening,
hence a flurry of statements emanating from the White House that East Germany, The
Soviet Union, North Korea and Cuba were training terrorists and funding their operations
in the United States. I doubt whether Nixon knew very much about IPS, let alone
suspected what it was doing to his presidency. We suffered the same kind of
disinformation during the Gulf War when the word went out that terrorists of all stripes
were about to invade the United States and blow up everything in sight.
President Nixon was literally left in the dark. He didn’t even know that David Young, a
Kissinger pupil, was working in the basement of the White House, supervising “leaks.”
Young was a graduate of Oxford and a long-time Kissinger associate through Round
Table assets such as the law firm of Milbank Tweed. President Nixon was no match for
the forces arrayed against him under the direction of M16 on behalf of the Royal Institute
for International Affairs and hence the British royal family.
About the only thing that Nixon was guilty of, in so far as Watergate is concerned, was
his ignorance of what was going on all around him. When James McCord “confessed” to
Judge John Sirica, Nixon should have been on to it like a flash that McCord was playing
a double game. He ought to have challenged Kissinger about his relationship with
McCord there and then. That would have thrown a spanner in the works and derailed the
whole M16-Watergate operation.
Nixon did not abuse his presidential powers. His crime was not defending the
Constitution of the United States of America and not charging Mrs. Katherine Meyer
Graham and Ben Brad-ley with conspiracy to commit insurrection. Mrs. Katherine Meyer
Graham’s pedigree is of the most doubtful kind, as “Jessica Fletcher” of “Murder She
Wrote” would soon have discovered. But even knowing that, Mrs. Graham’s controllers
in the Round Table would have fought hard to keep the lid on things. The role of the
Washington Post was to keep the pot boiling by one “revelation” after another, thereby
engendering a climate of public distrust of President Nixon, even when there was not one
shred of evidence to support wrong doing by him.
Yet it shows the immense power of the press, as Lippman and Bernays had quite properly
anticipated, in that Mrs. Graham, long suspected of the murder of her husband, Philip L.
Graham– officially classed as “suicide”–should have retained any credibility at all. Other
traitors who should have been indicted for insurrection and treason were Kissinger, Haig,
Halperin, Ellsberg, Young, McCord, Joseph Califano and Chomsky of IPS and those CIA
operatives who went to McCord’s house and burned all of his papers. Again, it is worth
repeating that Watergate, like many other operations we do not have the space to include
here, demonstrated the COMPLETE CONTROL exercised over the United States by the
Committee of 300.
While Nixon kept company with people like Earl Warren and some Mafia dons who had
built Warren’s house, that does not mean that he should have been disgraced over the
Watergate Affair. My dislike of Nixon stems from his willingness to sign the infamous
ABM Treaty in 1972 and his all-too-cozy relation-ship with Leonid Brezhnev. One of the
sorriest slip-ups of the Minority Council was its abject failure to expose the dirty role
played by INTERTEL, the Corning Group’s ugly private intelligence agency whom we
have already met, who “leaked” a lot of Watergate material to Edward Kennedy. Private
intelligence agencies like INTERTEL have no right to exist in the United States. They
are a MENACE to our right to privacy and an insult to all free men everywhere.
Blame must also fall on those who were supposed to protect President Nixon from the
kind of steelmesh net that was thrown around him to isolate him. The intelligence
personnel around Nixon were a poor lot who had no knowledge of just how thorough
British intelligence operations are; indeed, they had no inkling that Watergate was a
British intelligence operation in its entirety. The Watergate plot was a coup-d’etat against
the United States of America, as was the murder of John F. Kennedy. Although this fact
is not recognized as such today, I am confi- dent that when all the secret papers are
finally opened, history will record that two coup-d’etats, one against Kennedy and one
against Nixon, did indeed take place, and which in their wake brought the most violent
rape and assault on the institutions upon which the Republic of the United States stands.
The individual who most deserves the title of traitor and who is most guilty of sedition is
General Alexander Haig. This desk-man office-colonel whose paper-shuffling career did
not include commanding any troops in battle, was suddenly thrust upon the scene by the
invisible upper-level parallel government President Nixon once described him as a man
who had to ask Kissinger’s permission to go to the bathroom.
Haig was a product of the Round Table. He was noticed by Round Tabler Joseph
Califano, one of Her Majesty’s most trusted Round Tablers in the United States. Joseph
Califano, legal council of the Democratic National Convention, had actually interviewed
Alfred Baldwin, one of the plumbers A MONTH BEFORE THE BURGLARY TOOK
PLACE. Califano was stupid enough to write a memorandum on his interview with
Baldwin, in which he gave details of information on McCord’s background and why
McCord had selected Baldwin to be on the “team.”
Even more damaging, Califano’s memorandum contained full details of transcripts of
wiretaps of conversations between Nixon and the re-election committee, all this BEFORE
the break-in occurred. Califano should have been indicted on a score of federal offenses;
instead he got away cleanly with his criminal activity. Sanctimonious Sam Ervin refused
to allow Fred Thompson, Minority Council, to introduce this highly damaging evidence
at the Watergate hearings–on the spurious grounds that it was “too speculative.”
On Round Table orders, Kissinger had Haig promoted from colonel to four-star general
in the most meteoric rise ever recorded in the annals of United States military history, in
the course of which Haig was leap-frogged over 280 senior U.S. Army generals and highranking
officers.
During Haig’s “promotion,” and as a result of it, 25 senior generals were forced to resign.
As a reward for his treachery toward President Nixon, AND THE UNITED STATES,
Haig was subsequently given the plum job of Commanding General of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization forces (NATO), although he was THE LEAST QUALIFIED
COMMANDER EVER TO HOLD THAT POSITION. Here again he was leap-frogged
over 400 senior generals from NATO countries and the United States.
When the news of his appointment reached the Soviet Armed Forces High Command,
Marshall Orgakov recalled his three top Warsaw Pact generals from Poland and East
Germany, and there was much merrymaking, clinking of glasses and quaffing of
champagne until well into the night. All through Haig’s tenure as commander of NATO
forces the professional elite cadre of the Soviet Armed Forces, men who have never been
anything else but professional soldiers, held Haig in the utmost contempt and openly
referred to him as the “office manager of NATO.” They knew that Haig owed his
appointment to the RIIA and not to the United States military.
But before his military promotion took him out of Washington, let it be known that
Alexander Haig, in conjunction with Kissinger, all but destroyed the office of the
President of the United States and its government. The chaos left by Kissinger and Haig
in the wake of Watergate has never been chronicled to the best of my knowledge. On the
insistence of the RIIA, Haig virtually took over the management of the Government of
the United States after the April 1973 coup d’etat. Bringing 100 Round Table agents
chosen from the Brookings Institution, Institute Policy Studies and the Council on
Foreign Rela-tions, Haig filled the top one hundred posts in Washington with men who,
like himself, were beholden to a foreign power. In the ensuing debacle, the Nixon
Administration was torn asunder and the United States along with it.
Thrusting aside the pious platitudes and posturings of defending the Constitution, Senator
Sam Ervin did more to change the United States than anything President Nixon was
alleged to have done, and the United States has not yet recovered from the near-mortal
wound of Watergate, a Committee of 300 sponsored operation conducted by the Royal
Institute for International Affairs, the Round Table and “hands on” M16 officers based in
the United States.
The way President Nixon was first isolated, surrounded by traitors and then confused,
followed to the letter the Tavistock method of gaining full control of a person according
to the methodology laid down by Tavistock’s chief theoretician, Dr. Kurt Lewin. I have
already given details of Lewin’s methodology elsewhere in this book, but in view of the
text-book case of President Richard M.Nixon, I think it is worth repeating:
“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in
exactly this tactic–keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may
expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and
promises of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news, make the
cognitive structure of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual may cease even to
know a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions
even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed
by severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”
Kissinger and Haig followed Tavistock training manuals to the letter. The result was a
distraught, confused, frightened and demoralized President Nixon, whose only course of
action–he was told by Haig–was to resign. In 1983 I wrote two works, “The Tavistock
Institute: Sinister and Deadly” and “The Tavistock Institute: Britain’s Control of U.S.
Policy,” based upon Tavistock secret manuals which had fallen into my hands. Tavistock
Institute’s methods and actions are spelled out in these two works.
So successfully were Tavistock methods applied to unseat President Nixon that the
people of this nation fully believed the calumny of lies, distortions and set-piece
contrived situations mounted by the conspirator as truth, when in fact Watergate was a
diabolical lie from end to end. It is important to stress this because we have certainly not
seen the last of Watergate-type operations.
What were the alleged impeachable offenses committed by President Nixon, and the socalled
“smoking gun” evidence which was supposed to back up the charges? First, the
“smoking gun.” This piece of FICTION was created by Kissinger and Haig around the
June 23rd tape, which Haig coerced Nixon into surrendering to Leon Jaworski.
Haig spent hours convincing President Nixon that this tape would sink him, because it
proved “beyond any doubt” that Nixon was guilty of serious wrong doing and a coconspirator
in the Watergate break-in. President Nixon’s first response was to tell Haig,
“It’s utter nonsense to make such a big deal of this,” but Haig chipped away until Nixon
became convinced that he could not make a successful defense before the Senate, based
solely on this particular June 23rd tape!
How had Haig accomplished his mission? Acting out a scenario prepared for him by his
Round Table controllers, Haig had an unedited transcript of the “smoking gun” tape typed
by his staff. In reality there was nothing in the tape that President Nixon could not have
explained. Sensing this, Haig then circulated his unauthorized unedited transcript of the
tape among Nixon’s staunchest supporters in the House and Senate and the Republican
Party high command. Peppered with “smoking gun” and “devastating,” and coming from
Nixon’s trusted aide, the transcript had the effect of a falcon hitting a flock of pigeons;
Nixon’s supporters panicked and ran for cover.
Following up his sedition and insurrection, Haig summoned to his office Congressman
Charles Wiggins, a staunch Nixon supporter who had agreed to lead the fight in the
House to head off impeachment proceedings. In a bare-faced blatant lie, Wiggins was
informed by Haig, “The fight is lost.” After that Wiggins lost all interest in defending
Nixon, believing that Nixon himself had agreed to give up. Haig then dealt with Senator
Griffin, a leading supporter of the president in the Senate in the same way. AS A
RESULT OF HAIG’S SEDITIOUS, TREASONOUS ACTIVITIES, SENATOR
GRIFFIN IMMEDIATELY WROTE A LETTER TO PRESIDENT NIXON CALLING
UPON HIM TO RESIGN.
THREE MONTHS EARLIER, Round Table controlled Institute for Policy Studies, child
of James Warburg, founder and a fellow, Marcus Raskin, delivered EXACTLY the same
ultimatum that President Nixon resign, using the British intelligence propaganda journal,
The New York Times of May 25th to deliver the ultimatum. The Watergate tragedy was a
step in the irreversible transition to barbarism which is enveloping the United States, and
which is leading us into the One World Government-New World Order. The United
States is now at the same place that Italy found itself when Aldo Moro tried to rescue it
from created instability.
With what wrongdoing was Nixon charged? John Doar, whose brutish character was
well-suited to his task of bringing so-called articles of impeachment against the president,
was the author and finisher of one of the most far-reaching ILLEGAL domestic
surveillance counterintelligence operations ever run in the United States.
Heading the Interdepartmental Intelligence Unit (IDIU), Doar garnered information from
every conceivable agency of the federal government, including the Internal Revenue
Service. The program was linked to the Institute for Policy Studies. One of the highlights
of John Doar’s career was to provide the CIA– which is forbidden by law to engage in
domestic surveillance, with 10,000-12,000 names of citizens he suspected as political
dissidents, for further investigation.
On July 18th, 1974, this great upholder of the law, with measured pomposity, delivered
the “charges” against President Nixon, which episode was nationally televised. THERE
WAS NOT A SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE THAT NIXON HAD DONE
ANYTHING IMPEACHABLE; indeed, Doar’s pathetic litany of Nixon’s alleged
“crimes” were so trivial that it is a wonder the proceedings went beyond this point.
Income tax fiddling, unauthorized bombing of Cambodia and a vague “abuse of power”
charge that would never have stuck in a court of law was the best that Doar could do. The
United States was as unstable as it would ever be when President Nixon resigned on
August 8th, 1974.
Nowhere more so than in our economic and fiscal policies. In 1983 the international
bankers met in Williamsburg, Virginia to work out a strategy to prepare the United States
for a total disintegration of its banking system. This planned event was to stampede the
U.S. Senate into accepting control of our monetary and fiscal policies by the International
Monetary Fund (IMF). Dennis Weatherstone of Morgan Guarantee on Wall Street stated
that he was convinced this was the only way for the United States to save itself.
The proposal was endorsed by the Ditchley Group which had its beginning in May of
1982 at Ditchley Park in London. On January lOth-11th, l983, this alien group met in
Washington D.C., in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and the Clayton Act, and
conspired to overthrow the sovereignty of the United States of America in its monetary
and financial freedom. The United States Attorney General knew of the meeting and its
purpose. Instead of charging members of the group with con-spiracy to commit a federal
crime, he simply looked the other way.
Under the abovementioned acts, proof of a conspiracy is all that is needed for a felony
conviction, and there was ample evidence that a conspiracy did indeed take place. But as
the Ditchley Foundation had met at the request of the Royal Inst tute for International
Affairs and was hosted by the Round Table, no one in the Justice Department had the
courage to take action as required by those who had sworn to uphold the laws of the
United States.
The Ditchley Plan to usurp control of the fiscal and monetary policies of the United
States was the brainchild of Sir Harold Lever, a strong backer of Zionism and a close
confidant of members of the British royal family and a member of the Committee of 300.
Sir Harold Lever was a director of the giant UMILEVER conglomerate, an important
Committee of 300 company. Lever’s plan called for the IMF’s influence to be broadened
so that it could influence central banks of all nations, including the U.S. and guide them
into the hands of a One World Government bank.
This was considered a vital step in bringing about a situation where the IMF would
become the supreme arbiter of world banking. The ultra-secret January meeting was
preceded by an earlier meeting in October 1982, and was attended by representatives of
36 of the world’s top banks who met at the New York Vista Hotel. Security for the
October 26th-27th seminar was as tight as anything ever seen in the Big Apple. This
earlier Ditchley Group meeting also violated United States law.
Addressing the meeting, Sir Harold Lever said it was essential that national sovereignty
as an archaic hang-over must be ended before the year 2000. “The United States will soon
have to realize that it will be no better than any Third World country when the IMF takes
control,” said Sir Harold. It was later reported to the delegates that plans to appoint the
IMF as the controller of United States fiscal policies were being readied to bring before
the United States Senate by the year 2000.
Rimmer de Vries, speaking for Morgan Guarantee, said it was high time that the United
States became a member of the Bank of International Settlements. “There must be a
reconsideration of U.S. hesitancy over the past 50 years,” De Vries declared. Some
British and German bankers, fearing possible violations of U.S. law, said that the
Ditchley Group is nothing but a committee to iron out exchange rate problems. Felix
Rohatyn also spoke of the great need to change U.S. banking laws so that the IMF could
play a greater role in this country. Rohatyn headed Lazard Freres, a Club of Rome bank
and part of the Eagle Star Group which we have already met.
Round Tablers William Ogden and Werner Stang spoke enthusiastically in support of
surrendering U.S. fiscal sovereignty to the International Monetary Fund and the Bank of
International Settlements. Delegates representing the Alpha ranking Group, a P2
Freemasonry bank, said the United States must be forced to surrender to “the higher
authority of a world bank,” before any progress toward the New World Order could be
made.
On January 8th, 1983, before their big meeting on January lOth-11th, Hans Vogel, a
leading Club of Rome member, was received at the White House. President Ronald
Reagan had invited George Schultz, Caspar Weinberger, George Kennan and Lane
Kirkland to be present at his meeting with Vogel, who explained to President Reagan
what the aims and objectives of the Ditchley Group were. From that day, President
Reagan did an about face and worked with the Committee of 300’s various agencies to
advance the International Monetary Fund and the Bank of International Settlements as the
authority on U.S domestic and foreign monetary policies.
The invisible government of the Committee of 300 has put tremendous pressure on
America to change its ways–for the worse. America is the last bastion of freedom and
unless our freedoms are taken away from us, progress toward a One World Government
will be considerably slowed. Such an undertaking as a One World Government is a
massive one, requiring a great deal of skill, organizing abilities, control of governments
and their policies. The only organization that could possibly have undertaken this
mammoth task with any hope of success is the Committee of 300, and we have seen just
how far it has come toward total success.
Above all, the battle is a spiritual one. Unfortunately, the Christian churches have become
little more than social clubs run by the infinitely evil World Council of Churches (WCC),
whose beginnings lie not in Moscow but in the City of London, as we see from the chart
at the end of the book which gives the structure of the One World Government Church.
This body was set up in the 1920’s to serve as a vehicle for One World Government
policies, and stands as a monument to the long-range planning capabilities of the
Committee of 300.
Another corrupt body similar in structure and design to the WCC is the Union of
Concerned Scientists, set up by the Trilateral Commission, and funded by the Carnegie
Endowment Fund, the Ford Foundation and Aspen Institute. This is the group that has led
the fight to prevent the United States from mounting an effective deterrent against Soviet
Cosmospheres, space-based laser beam weapons which can destroy selected targets in the
United States or elsewhere from outer space.
The United States SDI program was designed to counter the threat posed by Soviet
Cosmospheres, a threat which still exists in spite of the assurances that “communism is
dead.” Soviet spokesman Georgi Arbatov told a meeting of the Union of Concerned
Scientists that it is important for them to oppose the SDI program, because if the SDI
program became operational, “it will be a military catastrophe.” Year after year the
Union of Concerned Scientists has opposed every budget which included funding for the
vital SDI program, until by the end of 1991, there is not even enough money to fund
further research still required let alone place the system in orbit. The Union of Concerned
Scientists is run by the Royal Institute for International Affairs and is heavily infiltrated
with M16 British intelligence agents.
There is not one single aspect of life in America that is not watched over, steered in the
“right” direction, manipulated, and controlled by the invisible government of the
Committee of 300. There is not one elected official or political leader that is not subject
to its rule. No one thus far has got away with defying our secret rulers, who do not
hesitate to make “a horrible example” of anyone, including the President of the United
States of America.
From 1776 when Jeremy Bentham and William Petty, the Earl of Shelburne, fresh from
the triumph of the French Revolution which they planned and ran, were drafted by the
British Crown to bring their combined experience to bear against the colonists, to 1812
when the British sacked and burned Washington, destroying secret documents that would
have exposed the treason being worked against the young United States of America to the
Watergating of President Nixon and assassination of President Kennedy, the hand of the
Committee of 300 is clearly visible. This book is an attempt to open the eyes of the
American people to this terrible truth: We are not an independent nation, nor can we ever
be, as long as we are ruled by an invisible government, the Committee of 300.
PAST AND PRESENT INSTITUTIONS/ ORGANIZATIONS AND THOSE
DIRECTLY UNDER INFLUENCE OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300
Academy for Contemporary Problems.
Africa Fund.
Agency of International Development.
Albert Previn Foundation.
Alliance Israelite Universalle
American Civil Liberties Union
American Council of Race Relations.
American Defense Society.
American Press Institute.
American Protective League.
Anti-Defamation League.
Arab Bureau.
Arab Higher Committee.
ARCA Foundation.
Armour Research Foundation.
Arms Control and Foreign Policy Caucus.
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
Asian Research InstituteAspen Institute.
Association for Humanistic Psychology.
Augmentation Research Center.
Baron De Hirsh Fund.
Battelle Memorial Institute.
Berger National Foundation.
Berlin Center for Future Research.
Bilderbergers.
Black Order.
Boycott Japanese Goods Conference.
British Newfoundland Corporation.
British Royal Society.
Brotherhood of Cooperative Commonwealth.
Bureau of International Revolutionary Propaganda.
Canadian Jewish Congress.
Cathedral of St. John the Divine, New York.
Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences.
Center for Constitutional Rights.
Center for Cuban Studies.
Center for Democratic Institutions.
Center for International Policy.
Center for the Study of Responsive Law
Christian Socialist League.
Cini Foundation.
Club of Rome.
Cominform.
Committee for the Next Thirty Years.
Committee of Fourteen.
Committee on National Morale.
Committee to Frame
A World Constitution.
Communist League.
Congress of Industrial Organizations.
Council on Foreign Relations.
David Sassoon Company.
De Beers Consolidated Mines.
Democratic League of Brussels.
East India Committee of 300.
Economic and Social Control (ECOSOC).
Environmental Fund. Environmetrics Inc.
Esalen Institute.
Fabian Society.
Federation of American Zionists.
Fellowship for a Christian Social Order.
Fellowship of Reconciliation. Ford Foundation.
Fordham University Institution Educational Research.
Foundation for National Progress.
Garland Fund.
German Marshall Fund.
Governing Body of the Israelite Religious Community.
Gulf South Research Institute.
Haganah.
Harvard University.
Hells Fire Club.
Horace Mann League.
Hudson Guild.
Hudson Institute.
Hudson Bay Company.
Imperial College University of London.
ndustrial Christian Fellowship.
Institute for Brain Research.
Institute for Pacific Relations.
Institute for Policy Studies.
Institute for Social Research.
Institute for the Future.
Institute for World Order.
Institute on Drugs, Crime and Justice.
Inter-Alpha.
Inter-American Social Development Institute.
International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Interreligious Peace Colloquium.
Irgun. Knights of Malta.
League of Nations.
Logistics Management Institute.
London Board of Deputies of British Jews.
London School of Economics.
Mary Carter Paint Company.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mellon Institute.
Metaphysical Society.
Milner Group.
Mocatto Metals.
Mont Pelerin Society.
NAACP.
National Action Research on Military/lndustrial Complex.
National Center for Productivity Institute.
National Council of Churches.
National Opinion Research Center.
National Training Laboratories.
New Democratic Coalition.
New World Foundation.
New York Rand Institute.
NORML.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
Odd Fellows.
Order of St. John of Jerusalem.
Order of The Golden Dawn.
OXFAM.
Oxford Univac.
Pacific Studies Center.
Palisades Foundation.
Peninsula and Orient Navigation Company.
PERMINDEX.
Princeton University.
Rand Corporation.
Rand School of Social Sciences.
Research Triangle Institution.
Rhodes Scholarship Committee.
Rio Tinto Zinc Company.
Riverside Church Disarmament Program.
Round Table.
Royal Institute for International Affairs.
Russell Sage Foundation.
San Francisco Foundation.
Sharps Pixley Ward.
Social Science Research Council. Socialist International.
Socialist Party of the United States.
Society for Promotion of Study of Religions.
Society of Heaven (TRIADS).
Soviet State Committee for Science and Technology.
Stanford Research Institute.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Sun Yat Sen Society.
Systems Development Corporation.
Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
Tempo Corporation.
The High Twelve International.
The Public Agenda Foundation.
The Quality of Life Institute.
Theosophist Society.
Thule Society.
Transatlantic Council.
Trilateral Commission.
U.S. Association of the Club of Rome.
U.S. Institute for Peace.
Union of Concerned Scientists.
UNITAR.
University of Pennsylvania Wharton School.
Warburg, James P. and Family.
Western Training Laboratories.
Wilton Park.
Women’s Christian Temperance Union.
Wong Hong Hon Company.
Work in America Institute.
World Council of Churches.
SPECIAL FOUNDATIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS
Arab Bureau.
Aristotelian Society.
Asian Research Institute.
Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation.
British American Canadian Corporation.
Brotherhood of Eternal Love.
Cambridge Apostles.
Canadian Histadrut Campaign.
Canadian Pacific Ltd.
Caribbean-Central American Action Group.
China Everbright Holdings Ltd.
Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs.
Council of South America.
Endangered Peoples’ Society.
English Property Corporation Ltd.
Hospice Inc.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
International Red Cross.
Jerusalem Foundation, Canada.
Kissinger Associates.
Kowloon Chamber of Commerce.
Organization of American States.
Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee.
Radio Corporation of America (RCA).
Royal Police of Hong Kong.
YMCA.
BANKS
American Express.
Banca de la Svizzera d’Italia.
Banca Andioino.
Banca d’America d’Italia.
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro.
Banca Privata.
Banco Ambrosiano.
Banco Caribe.
Banco Commercial Mexicana.
Banco Consolidato.
Banco d’Espana.
Banco de Colombia.
Banco de Commercio.
Banco de Iberio-America.
Banco de la Nacion.
Banco del Estada.
Banco Internacional.
Banco Latino.
Banco Mercantile de Mexico.
Banco Nacional de Cuba.
Banco Nacional de Panama and 54 smaller Panamanian banks.
Bangkok Commercial d’Italian.
Bangkok Metropolitan Bank.
Bank al Meshreq.
Bank America. Bank for International Settlements.
Bank Hapoalim.
Bank Leu.
Bank Leumi.
Bank of Bangkok.
Bank of Boston.
Bank of Canada.
Bank of Credit and Commerce International.
Bank of East Asia.
Bank of England.
Bank of Escambia.
Bank of Geneva.
Bank of Ireland.
Bank of London and Mexico.
Bank of Montreal.
Bank of Norfolk.
Bank of Nova Scotia.
Bank Ohio.
Banque Bruxelles-Lambert.
Banque Commerciale Arabes.
Banque du Credit International.
Banque e Paris et Pays-Bas.
Banque Francais et Italienn por l’Amerique du Sud.
Banque Louis Dreyfus e Paris.
Banque Privee.
Banques Sud Ameris.
Barclays Bank.
Baring Brothers Bank.
Barnett Banks.
Baseler Handeslbank.
Basel Committee on Bank
Supervision. BCCI.*
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
Centrust Bank.
Chartered Bank.
Charterhouse Japhet Bank.
Chase Manhattan Bank.
Chemical Bank.
Citibank.
Citizens and Southern Bank of Atlanta.
City National Bank of Miami.
Claridon Bank.
Cleveland National City Bank.
Corporate Bank and Trust Company.
Credit and Commerce American Holdings.
Credit and Commerce Holdings, Netherlands Antilles.
Credit Suisse.
Crocker National Bank.
de’Neuflize, Schlumberger, Mallet Bank.
Dresdener Bank.
Dusseldorf Global Bank.
First American Bank of Georgia.
First American Bank of New York.
First American Bank of Pensacola.
First American Bank of Virginia.
First American Banking Corp.
First Empire Bank.
First Fidelity Bank.
First National Bank of Boston.
First National City Bank.
Florida National Bank.
Foreign Trade Bank.
Franklin National Bank.
Hambros Bank.
Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.
Independence Bank of Encino.
Israeli Discount Bank.
Litex Bank.
Ljubljanska Bank.
Lloyds Bank.
Marine Midland Bank.
Midland Bank.
Morgan Bank.
Morgan Et Cie.
Morgan Grenfell Bank.
Narodny Bank.
National Bank of Cleveland.
National Bank of Florida.
National Westminister Bank.
Orion Bank.
Paravicini Bank Ltd.
Republic National Bank.
Royal Bank of Canada.
Schroeder Bank.
Seligman Bank.
Shanghai Commercial Bank.
Soong Bank.
Standard and Chartered Bank.
Standard Bank.
Swiss Bank Corporation.
Swiss Israel Trade Bank.
Trade Development Bank.
Unibank.
Union Bank of Israel.
Union Bank of Switzerland.
Vanying Bank.
White Weld Bank.
World Bank.
World Commerce Bank of Nassau.
World Trade Bank.
Wozchod Handelsbank.
Note: With the exception of the Basel Committee on Banking each of the above
mentioned banks have been, and may still be involved in the drug, diamond, gold and
weapons trade.
* BCCI. This bank has been indicted on several charges of being heavily involved in
drug money laundering throughout the world. Its structure girds every operation of the
Committee of 300. Of interest is its corporate structure.
BCCI Middle East Interests, 35% of stock held by:
Ruling Families of:
Bahrain.
Sharjah.
Dhubai.
Saudi Arabia.
and a group of Middle East businessmen.
BCCI Cayman Islands 41%.
Bank of America 24%.
BCCI Cayman Islands and BCCI Luxembourg established Agency offices in Miami,
Boca Raton, Tampa, New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles.
LEGAL ASSOCIATIONS AND LAWYERS
American Bar Association.
Clifford and Warnke.
Coudert Brothers.
Cravaith,
Swain and Moore.
Wilkie, Farr and Gallagher.
ACCOUNTANTS/AUDITORS
Price, Waterhouse.
TAVISTOCK INSTITUTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
FLOW LABORATORIES
Gets contracts from the National Institute of Health.
MERLE THOMAS CORPORATION
Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.
WALDEN RESEARCH
Does work in the field of pollution control.
PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION, ARTHUR D. LITTLE, G.E. “TEMPO,”
OPERATIONS RESEARCH INC.
Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make
recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called “a
possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientifictechnological
elite.”
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Dedicates its work to what it calls a “national agenda.” Wrote President Hoover’s
program, President Roosevelt’s “New Deal,” the Kennedy Administration’s “New
Frontiers” program (deviation from it cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President
Johnson’s “Great Society.” Brookings has been telling the United States Government how
to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so on behalf of the Committee
of 300.
HUDSON INSTITUTE
Under the direction of Herman Khan, this institution has done more to shape the way
Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct
themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy
research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET.
(One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.) Some of its
earlier papers were entitled “Stability and Tranquility Among Older Nations,” and
“Analytical Summary of U.S. National Security Policy Issues.”
Hudson prides itself on its diversity; it helped NASA with its space programs and helped
to promote new youth fashions and ideas, youth rebellion and alienation for the
Committee of 300, ostensibly funded by Coca Cola. Hudson may be quite properly
classified as one of the Committee of 300’s BRAIN-WASHING establishments. Some of
its nuclear war scenarios make for very interesting reading and, if they can be obtained, I
would recommend “The 6 Basic Thermonuclear Threats” and “Possible Outcomes of
Thermonuclear War” and one of its more frightening papers entitled “Israeli-Arab
Nuclear War.”
Hudson also does corporate advising for Committee of 300 companies, Rank, Xerox,
General Electric, IBM and General Motors, to name but a few of them, but its really big
client remains the U. S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense,
national security, military policy and arms control. To date it has not got into “wet
NASA,” that is to say, the National Oceanographic Agency.
NATIONAL TRAINING LABORATORIES NTL
is also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute
is definitely a brainwashing center based on Kurt Lewin principles which include socalled
T-Groups (training groups), artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly
find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL
takes in the National Education Association, the largest teacher-group in the United
States. While officially decrying “racism,” it is interesting to note that NTL, working with
NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-toteach
children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the
number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a
normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WHARTON SCHOOL OF FINANCE &
COMMERCE
Founded by Eric Trist, one of the “brain trusts” of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of
the more important Tavistock institutions in the U.S. in so far as “Behavioral Research” is
concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor — which it
teaches how to produce “cooked” statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting
Associates Incorporated. This method is very much in demand as we come to the close of
1991 with millions more out of work than is reflected in USDL statistics. Wharton’s
ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in
the United States, Western Europe and by the International Monetary Fund, the United
Nations and the World Bank. Wharton has produced such note-worthy persons as George
Schultz and Alan Greenspan.
INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH
This is the institute set up by “brain trusters” from Tavistock Rensis Likert, Dorwin
Cartwright and Ronald Lippert. Among its studies are “The Human Meaning of Social
Change,” “Youth in Transition” and “How Americans View Their Mental Health.”
Among the institute’s clients are The Ford Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S.
Postal Service and the U. S. Department of Justice.
INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE
This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet
it draws its long-range forecasting methodology from the mother of all think tanks.
Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in
time frames of fifty years. The institute is supposed to be able to forecast socioeconomic
trends and to blow the whistle on any departures from what it has laid down as normal.
Institute for the Future believes it is possible and normal to intervene now and give
decisions for the future. So-called “Delphi Panels” decide what is normal and what is not,
and prepare position papers to “steer” government in the right direction to head off such
groups as “people creating civil disorder.” (This could be patriotic groups demanding
abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.)
The institute recommends actions such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that
cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring
regitration of firearms, making the use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing
homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a
preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but by no means least,
a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new com munities be established in rural areas.
As will be observed, many of the Institute for the Future’s goals have already been more
than fully realized.
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)
One of the “Big Three,” IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and
domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the
United States, bolstered by Bertrand Russell and the British Socialists through its
networks in America which include the League for Industrial democracy in which
Leonard Woodcock played a leading, if behind-the-scenes role. Local lead players in the
League for Industrial Democracy included “conservative” Jeane Kirkpatrick, Irwin Suall
(of the ADL), Eugene Rostow (Arms Control negotiator), Lane Kirkland (Labor leader),
and Albert Shanker.
For record purposes only, IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard
Barnett, both highly-trained Tavistock Institute graduates. Most of the funding came from
Rothschild associates in America like the James Warburg Family, the Stern Family
Foundation and the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of
the Communist Party who stole the Faberge name (Faberge was “Jeweler of the Imperial
Russian Court”) and made a fortune out of the Faberge name.
The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round Table,
which agenda in turn came from Travistock Institute, one of the most notable being to
create the “New Left” as a grass roots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife
and unrest and spread chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate the “ideals” of left
wing nihilistic socialism, support unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the “big
stick” with which to beat the United States political establishment.
Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel
Ellsberg, National Security Council staff member Halperin, The Weathermen
Underground, the Venceramos and the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern.
No scheme was too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage.
Take the plot to “kidnap” Kissinger, which was in the hands of Eqbal Ahmed, a British
M16 intelligence agent of Pakistani origin, laundered through “TROTS” (Trotskyite
terrorists based in London). The “plot” was “discovered” by the FBI so that it could not
go too far. Ahmed went on to become the director of one of IPS’s most influential
agencies, The Transnational Institute which, chameleon-like, changed from its former
name, Institute of Race Relations, when intelligence agents of BOSS (Bureau of State
Security) in South Africa unmasked the fact that it was tied directly to Rhodes
Scholarship-Harry Oppenheimer and Anglo-American-British mining interests in South
Africa. BOSS also discredited the South Africa Foundation at the same time. Through its
many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its “big stick” to
beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently
but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by
seemingly different and varied lobbyists. In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to
successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for “the trend, the way
things are going.” By using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the
very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works.
To give only a single concrete example of what I am talking about: in 1975, an IPS point
man persuaded representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) and forty-seven members of
the House to request IPS to prepare a budget study that would oppose the budget being
prepared by President Gerald Ford. Although not adopted, the request was reinstated in
1976, 1977, and 1978 gathering sponsors as it went.
Then in 1978, fifty-six Congressmen signed their names to sponsor an IPS budget study.
This was prepared by Marcus Raskin. Raskin’s budget called for a fifty percent cut in the
Defense Budget, a socialist housing program “that would compete with and steadily
replace private housing and mortgage markets,” a national health service, “radical
changes in the educational system that would disrupt capitalist control over the
distribution of knowledge,” and several other very radical Socialist ideas.
The influence of IPS on Arms Control negotiations was a major factor in getting Nixon to
sign the treasonous ABM Treaty in 1972, which left the United States virtually
defenseless against ICBM attack for almost 10 years. IPS became, and remains to this
day one of the most prestigious “think tanks” controlling foreign policy decisions, which
we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers.
By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by
engineering such victories as “The Pentagon Papers,” besieging the corporate structure,
bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political
activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in
America, such as radical racial politics under the guise of religion, using the
establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to
the role which it was founded to play.
STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it